Another Fifty-One Canadian Soldiers Killed Protecting Europe OR Europe’s Gift That Keeps On Giving

copyright bannercsnafu photo header

spacer

Six Canadian Soldiers Died On Easter Sunday…

.

…when their LAV 3 rolled over a pressure-triggered “IED” while escorting a convoy in the Kandahar region of Afghanistan. Canada has had 2500 troops in Afghanistan since 2002. What takes this tragedy into the realm of irony is the explosion occurred while Canada was marking one of the worlds greatest military victories. Both events — the ongoing war in Afghanistan and the turning point of World War One at Vimy Ridge where Canadian soldiers broke the German line 90 years ago — are connected in a straight line by European hubris and imperialism from Sarajevo to Kandahar. From 64,000 Canadians dying in France to end WWOne to fifty-one Canadians dying in the desert of Afghanistan trying to recreate a country broken by Europe imperialism and neglect. What takes it back into tragedy again is Canadians are still dying over Europe’s refusal to take responsibility for its past.

By the second time America, Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada forced Germany to surrender, Europe had been at war with itself for twelve of thirty years. Thanks to Europe’s seeming inability to stop killing themselves nearly 70 million young men and another 30 million civilians had been slaughtered in barely three decades. Most of Europe’s cities and villages had been laid to waste, farms had been turned into battlefields for tanks. In every major city government buildings and vital archives had been razed to the ground. The industrial heart of Europe had been destroyed including the road and rail network needed to move manufactured goods from factory to customers. So much effort had been placed into mutual annihilation over so long a period Europe was on the brink of total collapse, by VE Day in 1945 the destruction had been so complete large parts of Europe resembled the Afghanistan of today.

Like Europe in the past, Afghanistan is a region of tribes with a predisposition for war. Unlike Europe, however, the last 150 years of Afghanistan warfare have been the direct result of foreign interference. In the 19th century it was Britain, from 1975 until 1990 Afghanistan was the central battleground for the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States, this was followed by ten years of civil war between American and Soviet backed forces which led directly to Afghanistan becoming the frontline for the “Global War on Terror” in 2001.

There have been two national Afghani governments in the past thirty-five years, one was a puppet for the Soviet Union, the other was the Taliban. One killed its citizens for conquest, the other out of lunacy, both were the result of Europe’s dysfunction.

The First World War started when Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in Sarajevo from a bullet fired on June 28, 1914, by Gavrilo Princip, a Serbian nationalist dying from tuberculosis. There is no Second World War without the First, no Cold War without the Second, no Soviet invasion of Afghanistan without the Cold War, no Soviets means no Taliban. But those wars did happen, and that bullet is still killing today.

France, Spain and Germany have troops in Afghanistan, but refuse to use them. Instead their soldiers rarely, if ever, leave their fortified bases. These three NATO countries only just recently agreed to support Canadian troops — also operating under the NATO flag — if Canadians are overrun by the Taliban. But only if they’re given 48-hours to prepare themselves.

Canada has been asked by the first democratic government in Afghanistan’s history to help stabilize their fragile country and to bring to justice the criminals killing Afghani citizens. Canadians are not there to rebuild Afghanistan, the country has never had a national power-grid or system of roads and trains. Afghanistan, as the bastard child of Europe and the Cold War, never had the historical opportunity to build national railways and highways. Canada is in Afghanistan to help build a new country. Most of Europe, meanwhile, seem content to ignore the situation their governments created.

Even with all of the advantages of an educated people, a common ideology and culture, and American protection and financial support available after 1945, it still took four decades to repair Europe economically, nearly fifty years to repair it politically and only recently — after the Balkans War threatened to pull it all down again — has the framework been adopted in the European Union to ensure there is never a war inside Europe again.

Afghanistan can only count on two things at the moment: Canadian, British, Danish and American soldiers will continue to be there for at least another two years, and; the United States will provide the bulk of financial support for the foreseeable future. Beyond that the Afghani people are on their own against a fanatical enemy determined on reinstating a fascist government. Will Afghani women have the right to go to school, or will men be allowed to rape them or stone them to death over honour slights such as young women being outside without a male family member as an escort? That’s the line on which Canadian soldiers stand right now.

Along with the United Kingdom, America, New Zealand and Australia, Canadian soldiers liberated Europe from fascist extremism twice, then we protected Europe both from itself and the Soviet Union for the duration of the Cold War. Now these same countries and a few others have given the people of Afghanistan the same opportunity for a peaceful and democratic government as Europe was offered sixty years ago. The people of Afghanistan deserve more from The Powers which now rule the prosperous and peaceful Europe that was handed to them.

Ninety years ago the four Canadian Divisions, 100,000 Canadian soldiers, fought a pitched battle against Germany which no one thought Canada or anyone else could win. For months Allied troops had tried to take Vimy and failed. In a matter of days Canada took and held Vimy in a battle most historians believe to be the turning point against Germany. After the war the French government ceded the 250 acres around Vimy Ridge, where 10,000 Canadians were killed or wounded in that one tide-turning battle, to Canada. That soil, surrounded by France, is literally a sovereign piece of Canada. That’s what Canada, a foreign power willing to commit its soldiers to rescue Europeans from war and warlords, did for Europe. Twice. Just something to think aboot as French, German and Spanish soldiers play cards in Kabul while six more Canadian soldiers are put into the ground.

.

-30- banner

.

About Gabriel

I’ve lived in more than fifty places. I've been paid to pick stones out of fields, take backstage photos of Britney Spears, and report on Internet privacy issues. My photos have been published in several newspapers, and a couple of magazines.
This entry was posted in Afghanistan, America, American Politics, Canada, Canadian Charter of Rights, Canadian News, Canadian Politics, CSN:AFU Aboot Canada, European Union, Facism, Middle East Politics, US Middle East Policy. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Another Fifty-One Canadian Soldiers Killed Protecting Europe OR Europe’s Gift That Keeps On Giving

  1. Queen Minx says:

    Do the Afghani people want a democratic government??? Do they want a fascist government?? Does anybody even know what they want??
    Politics confuses me … wars confuse me … it always seems as though ’someone’ is telling ’someone else’ what ‘they’ think should happen … maybe Afghani women don’t want to go to school, maybe they accept that rape is part of their culture, maybe they agree that they should be stoned if they step outside the house unescorted.
    And even though all of that is abhorrent to me, I am English and take it for granted that I have a ‘right’ to an education, and a ‘right’ not to be raped, and a ‘right’ to step out of the house minus a male escort.
    Isn’t this just the West saying ‘We have this great thing called ‘Democracy’ and yep, we know it doesn’t work ‘exactly’ how we would like, we still think it’s the bestest thing ‘ever’ for the whole wide world and any country and it’s people who don’t agree, well we are just gonna come over to your country and start a war until you see that democracy is the coolest fucking thing, EVER!’
    And isn’t this Western attitude towards World Wide Democracy exactly the reasons why Iran and China and other countries that don’t have ‘the coolest thing’ get pissed off with ‘The West’ or ‘Countries who have the coolest thing!’
    I dunno G, personally I couldn’t stand back and see a woman stoned or raped because she forgot to ask her Dad to take her to the fucking shop, but I am not Afghan and maybe that’s the way they want to do things and who am I to tell them different?? I don’t know if Democracy is the coolest thing ‘ever’ … because it seems to me that politicians still do whatever the fuck they want to do regardless of what people think … practically the whole of Britain disagreed with the UK’s involvement with the war in Iraq, didn’t make a damn difference.
    Of course, if it came to a matter of choice, wherein an Afghan Man or Woman (because we shouldn’t assume that Afghan Men like a good woman stoning or a Saturday afternoon rape), wants to leave their country because they don’t agree with the way the country is run, then fair enough, but then that person becomes exiled from their homeland, but is there even a choice?
    I suppose I just would like to know if Afghan people have been asked or are being asked what they would like to happen, instead of assuming that democracy is a ‘cool thing’ and everyone should have it.
    Just remember, shellsuits were cool once, and they’re not so shit-hot now, not even if you all it retro-chic.
    xx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s